Three ways to follow the archive depending on how close you need to be.
This is not a storefront. Think of these as reading modes: open access, periodic digests, and focused review windows around specific case files.
Programs make the archive feel sustained rather than purely decorative.
archive-ledOpen notes
Public pages, archive browsing, library shelves, and regular dispatches.
- All main pages available directly
- Best for casual browsing
- Uses the public GitHub root as the external anchor
Research digest
Periodic summaries of what changed across the archive, with emphasis on case files.
- Shorter, more curated reading path
- Useful when you want highlights over chronology
- Pairs well with the journal index and overview page
Focused review
A tighter pass through one case file, one guide, and the references that support them.
- Best for people following a specific topic
- Uses guide pages as the practical entry point
- Falls back to GitHub for broader context
Pick the mode that matches your reading distance.
Some visitors only need an open front door. Others want the archive filtered into a guided path. The programs page frames those differences without turning the site into a commercial funnel.
- Use open notes for broad exploration and casual browsing
- Use the digest mode when you want curation over chronology
- Use focused review when tracking a specific case file or guide
| Mode | Best for | Entry point |
|---|---|---|
| Open notes | General site browsing | Homepage |
| Research digest | Curated review of recent changes | Journal index |
| Focused review | One topic followed closely | Field guide |